Features of using ureteral stents after retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy in the treatment of ureteral stones

Yu.V. Roshchin, Yu.P. Sernyak, A.S. Fukszon, I.M. Komisarenko, S.P. Forostina


We analyzed the results of treatment of 53 patients who underwent laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for ureteral stones. In 18 (34 %) cases, the stent was not used after the surgery (group 1), and in 35 (66.0 %) patients, the stent (group 2) was placed. Drainage of the ureter by stent placement is absolutely justified procedure in the presence of significant changes in the ureteral wall. In our opinion, the following changes are important: swelling of all layers, the presence of ulcers of the mucous membrane, perifocal inflammation in the tissues surrounding the ureter, with the formation of an inflammatory cortex. On the other hand, stenting of the ureter after retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy is not a routine procedure, and in the absence of the above-mentioned changes, it can be refused without any complications.


ureteral stone; laparoscopic ureterolithotomy; stenting


Возіанов С.О. Сучасний підхід до діагностики ниркової коліки та уретеролітіазу / С.О. Возіанов, М.В. Зеляк // Урологія. — 2006. — Т. 10, № 2. —

С. 62-68.

Лесовой В.Н. Состояние окислительно-восстановительных процессов у больных уросепсисом при использовании метода озонотерапии / В.Н. Лесовой, В.И. Савенков // Експериментальна і клінічна медицина. — 2000. — № 4. — С. 100-103.

Серняк Ю.П. Современные методологические подходы к лечению камней мочеточника / Ю.П. Серняк, Ю.В. Рощин // Архив клинической и экспериментальной медицины. — 2013. — Т. 14, № 1. — С. 51-54.

Avital S., Hermon H., Greenberg R., Karin E., Skornick Y. Learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: our first 100 patients // Isr. Med. Assoc. J. — 2006. — 8. — Р. 683-686.

Chong G.O., Park N.Y., Hong D.G., Cho Y.L., Park I.S., Lee Y.S. Learning curve of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the early and locally advanced cervical cancer: comparison of the first 50 and sec- ond 50 cases // Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. — 2009. — 19. — Р. 1459-1464.

El-Moula M.G., Abdallah A., El-Anany F. et al. Laparoscopic ure- terolithotomy: our experience with 74 cases // Int. J. Urol. — 2008. — 15. — Р. 593-597.

Hatipoglu N.K., Penbegul N., Soylemez H. et al. Urological laparoscopic surgery: our experience of first 100 cases in Dicle University // J. Clin. Exp. Invest. — 2012. — 3. — Р. 44-48.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


© Publishing House Zaslavsky, 1997-2019


   Seo анализ сайта